Integrated composites models
Listen to this story as
a notebookLM podcast
We believe that composite architectures are the future of AI and its applications. Despite significant advancements, there are still critical challenges in AI research hindering widespread implementation. The field urgently needs solutions for scaling (beyond just computing power), efficient knowledge distillation, reduced operational costs, and sustainable energy requirements. Furthermore, persistent issues with hallucinations, safety, planning, and reasoning capabilities highlight a fundamental gap—current AI systems lack natural robustness and adaptability.
These issues point to a deeper challenge: the need for fundamentally different approaches to AI system design. This is why integrative architectures like composite AI are poised to contribute across domains (Figure 1)
Figure 1. Example of composite architectures
Composite AI Core: The heart of the system, integrating different AI capabilities into a unified solution. Foundation models: Language and vision models. Processing units: Task-specific models and decision engines (evaluators) Support infrastructure: Data pipelines and monitoring (performance tracking)
The need for evolutionary composite architectures
While current approaches focus on "one-model-fits-all", larger models, and more data, we need architectures that can evolve, adapt, and reason across contexts while maintaining reliability and efficiency. This is where bio-symbolic composite AI offers a promising path forward, constrained by nature's proven principles rather than brute-force computation. In addition to their flexibilty, these architectures enable the integration of third-party frontier foundational models, which can offer scientific ground for experimentation in academic labs and small private actors.
Bio-inspired neuro-symbolic AI
Neural-symbolic AI bridges network learning with symbolic reasoning, combining the pattern recognition capabilities of neural networks with the interpretability of logical rules. At Daice Labs, we believe that bio-symbolic composite AI takes this integration further by incorporating nature's broader computational principles—from cellular information processing to evolutionary adaptation (Figure 2).
While neural-symbolic systems mirror brain-like computation, bio-symbolic architectures draw from the entire spectrum of biological intelligence, offering a richer template for resilient and adaptive systems. These architectures aren't just brain-inspired but nature-optimized, constraining system design to key evolutionary-like principles. By encoding nature's computational strategies—from cellular processing units to environmental adaptation and collective intelligence—into symbolic frameworks, we unlock new possibilities for contextually-aware AI systems that evolve and specialize like natural organisms.
Figure 2. Example of symbolic composite architectures
Composite AI core (black) includes the integration hub. Data-driven AI (blue) includes foundation models, multi-agent systems, and neural processing (NN architectures). This can also incorporate vertical LLMs. Neural-symbolic ai (red) includes symbolic logic and knowledge graphs (domain specific GNN+LLM). Bio-symbolic ai (green) includes bio-inspired principles of integration and evolutionary-like computing (specific processing units, collective behavior, resource allocation, new adaptive strategies). Adaptive optimization are strategies designed to modulate overal integration and performance.
The challenge of dynamic systems
Dynamic systems are characterized by constant change, interdependence, and the need to adapt to shifting conditions/environments. These systems, whether natural or human-made, are shaped by complex interactions among their components, often resulting in unpredictable behaviors and emergent phenomena. Financial systems, digital commerce platforms, and biological systems exemplify such dynamics, sharing core traits like high interconnectivity, continuous evolution, and adaptive behavior. Their inherent complexity arises from many interacting variables, often producing emergent phenomena that are difficult to predict with traditional models.
Therefore the need for innovative frameworks that understand and modulate their complex behavior.
Our approach: from scientific discovery to dynamic systems applications
The convergence of artificial intelligence and biological systems creates a powerful cycle of discovery and innovation. Our approach implements a variation of neurosymbolic AI, bio-symbolic composite AI, grounded in key adaptability and evolutionary principles, to navigate complex system challenges. The bidirectional exchange between AI and bioengineering (Figure 3) drives breakthroughs in both fields, leading to practical applications across dynamic domains (see our publications). We strategically focus on digital, financial, and cellular systems as ideal environments for testing and refining context-aware evolution, where our technology demonstrate its capability to adapt and learn frollowing key natural principles.
Figure 3. Discovery cycle: Bio-symbolic composite AI driving innovation
Bidirectional discovery cycle between Composite AI and Bioengineering. The cycle generates scientific discoveries leading to both open-source developments and practical applications. Dynamic systems applications branch into specialized domains: financial systems, digital commerce, and advanced software solutions. Colors represent different innovation layers: discovery cycle (pink), core technologies (blue), scientific outcomes (green), open-source initiatives (light green), and applied
"Where nature's resilence meets intelligent systems"
Daice Labs Inc.
Brookline, MA, USA